data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bebbc/bebbcaa2e9210cb52bc1f54ae632bf9fb70e507e" alt=""
On the last post there was some question to the inspiration to these sketches, I thought I would go ahead and clear things up a bit. The Muppets were the inspiration for these sketches, not Ronald Searle.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc9ee/bc9ee34976c2684f54412f099f448b68af5c3d7d" alt=""
I love Searle’s work, but I believe Searle’s work relies heavily on the 2D medium. Nothing wrong with that if you are doing illustrations, but if you’re doing CG animation it can become a stumbling block into a 3D translation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/511ce/511ce1b42bbd0c79d79f941cc9f2292b926e86b1" alt=""
Having started my career in 2D animation, and now working in CG animation, I've witnessed a learning curve that is taking place with this industry -- and within my own commercial work. I’ve really been learning to appreciate the simplicity of the Muppets for that reason.
There’s another general question regarding “inspiration” versus “copying.” Although I think there is much value in copying when you’re starting out, at this point in my career I think it’s better to learn a lesson and apply the understanding, rather than copy a technique.
13 comments :
Post a Comment